Well I am happy to say that the election is underway and I have already voted.
I had a few thoughts about the change of quorum that is proposed.
- Current bylaws: A majority of the Individual Members voting (but only if at least 25% of the Individual Members vote at an annual or special meeting). This 25% threshold was selected rather arbitrarily at the time the bylaws were drafted and did not anticipate the number of Individual Members which have joined the Foundation. The 2014 election for Individual Directors had participation of less than 15% of the Individual Members.
- Revised bylaws: A majority of the Individual Members voting (but only if at least 10% of the Individual Members vote at an annual or special meeting).
Elections are never easy, but it is the only way to get the opinion of the public and your constituents. OpenStack as a community is no different.
I have seen a growing number of posts or tweets about requesting people to cast their vote. There is a concern in the air (at least that is my personal feeling) that a quorum will not be met. This will have a number of implications on the changes in the bylaws, which could be a problematic for the future growth of the community. I am not going to go into the subject of, if I am in favor of the changes or not – we are all entitled to our own opinions.
Accepting results if only a minimum of 10% of the members of the community participate.
(I would like to clarify – that results of a vote are valid – even if the number of participants are low).
According to Stefano Maffulli’s post – the people who can vote are those who are “active members of the OpenStack Foundation”. The number of people who vote for the TC elections – is going down. The bylaws define “active members” is defined as a member who has participated in one of the last two board elections.
The number of people who have joined the OpenStack foundation has grown so large that it will be very difficult to achieve a quorum going forward.
If you are interested in participating OpenStack, take the time and make the effort to sign up, then you should also make an effort to exercise your right and vote.
I am just worried about the decreasing numbers and what that says about the community. If the OpenStack community accepts or expects that only having 10% of people will participate in elections and vote on important issues then What does that say about the OpenStack community as a whole?
Why is quorum needed? Who is to say that 10% is acceptable? Why not 15%? Why not 20%? Or for that matter – why not 2%? Who says that 10% is a quorum?
Take a national election for example. What would happen that if for the parliament or president – you needed a quorum? That does not happen. It cannot happen. An election is a democratic process, where each eligible is asked to participate. If they choose not to – then that is their right – but you cannot nullify the whole election – when not enough people vote.
I think that a quorum is the number of people who vote. There should be no minimum.
This does not change the fact that today this has to be changed – because the bylaws today state a number of 25%.
It just seems strange to me.
Lowering the threshold – the question is how low do you go? Instead of having to go through this again in the future – it better to remove that obstacle now than have to beg for people to vote in order to achieve a quorum.
Your thoughts and comments are always welcome.